(421 = a prime.)

Six new inanimate scrawls:

Three-Halves Of

Semi-Trigonometric

Symmetry

Emptiness Stirred Mathematically

Creation Transformed

By The Glassiness Of

Transformative Sands

Subaxiomatic Particularities

Amorphousness Yet Rotating..

As Unto Trigonometry's Shape

Skulvis

(Of course, the bottom image's

name, "Skulvis", is a portmanteau.

And the image above that has

a title which is an anagram.)

--------------------------------

--------------------------------

Anagrams:

14.

[Fourteen,

Rue of net,

To unfree.]

{I will not say there

are now 15 anagrams,

because this one above

is not really worthy

of being counted.}

Amorphousness

yet rotating...

=

As unto

trigonometry's

shape.

---

A polygon forms as

rotations there.

=

Those portrayals

are of its gnomon.

---

A scalar's

synesthesia

appears.

=

Any is as

spectral as

are shapes.

---

A spectral show:

So seen, so heard.

=

.. As were those

shapes and colors.

---

Dimensions are

synesthetic;

as poetic

formations

were drawn so.

=

Any creation is of

its space-time's

own theorems

and/or weirdness.

---

Time-pieces are so

distant then small

yet asymmetrical.

=

Most emptiness is

entirely created

as mathematically.

---

An angular hourglass

is of that, in this

passageway's descent.

=

The lens' focus was

as a gate; as any

sand-grains slip

through it.

---

In this hourglass

of shade's angular

descent,

=

.. The sand-grains

slide as through a

lens' focus.

---

The exacting

atoms align;

All is any.

=

Things entangle

as axiomatically.

---

The glassiness is

almost ideal yet

plexiform yet

harmonic.

=

That aperiodic helix

of atoms else aligns

in less symmetry.

---

One is divided and

is else as also

are its own zones.

=

In zero-lessness

inside, alas,

a void too

was denied.

---

Soon was...

=

Now; so as.

---

Odd piles:

=

Lopsided.

[^Did I post

this one already?

Worth posting

again, anyway.]

---

Finality else was:

=

Nils as we yet fail.

--------------------------------

--------------------------------

They say, even a broken clock

is correct twice per day.

But, a working sundial,

on the other hand*, is

correct

*half*the day!

(But, these days, it is wrong

over half of those half-days

it would have otherwise been

correct, because of

Daylight-Savings Time --

but that is yet another

topic for yet another day

{which is Sunday, or

tomorrow as of when I

posted this}.)

*[On the other gnomon?]

-------------

You hear about that clock

which periodically stops?

Yeah, it predictably

does break like..

clockwork (sometimes does).

[If this clock is not auto-set

somehow, I am wondering how

this hypothetical clock would

even know when it is to break?

Hmmm..]

{^And my attempt at

pseudo-philosophy has accidently

begotten a possible riddle.}

--------------------------------

Introspective rainbows often

have their moments of..

'self-refraction'..

--------------------------------

Speaking of looking at oneself:

Why are "selfies" not more

commonly spelled "cell-fies"?

Maybe the word "cell-fy" is

wisely being reserved

(by whomever/whatever dictates

trendy words) for when, in the

very near future, AI tech

becomes so advanced that

cell-phones somehow achieve

consciousness and vanity, and

so those phones then begin to

take pictures of themselves

using their own cameras.

(Then people's cell-phones too

will become as annoying as now

are the people who use them.)

--------------------------------

Both the poor and the rich

need to make far more money.

But the difference is:...

The poor need to do so..

so to pay their bills.

Yet the rich need to do so..

so to pay their shills.

[.. And they both must

.. make their kills

just to have their fills.

.. To hunt, they must:

As it so is just;

as this common need

has been decreed.

And despite our skills

and despite our ills,

each such kill fulfills;

thus, its money thrills.

And we ourselves survive,

as we each always will,

still,

or.. we all will do so

only.. until...]

[.. Our nil?]

--------------------------------

[Did I post the

following already?]

Maybe pet-lovers

should refer to dogs as

'canine-beings'

and to cats as

'feline-beings'?

--------------------------------

Speaking of anthropomorphization:

Immigrants deported from a

country, now called "deportees",

should maybe instead be called,

to humanize them more,

"demigrants",

to be more politically-correct,

perhaps.

(And, as a bonus, "dem" resembles

Greek for "the people", "demos".

On the other hand, given that

"demi" is a prefix which means

'half', "demigrant" looks like it

might mean a person who has been

halfway granted something, such

as, say, permanent residency

and/or citizenship in the country

they are now living in.)

However, conversely, maybe

non-person items that,

after being imported into

a nation, have then been

returned back to their nation

of origin for whatever reason

("exported" or "deported" to

there, you might say) maybe

could be called..

'deports' (as a noun).

--------------------------------

[Have I posted the

following already?]

Siblings essentially are..

zeroth-cousins.

--------------------------------

The overlapping words of

this portmanteau, herein,

are moreover quite as..

'moreoverlapped'.

--------------------------------

--------------------------------

If you have the list of all

paradoxes where each paradox

in the list references Russell's

Paradox within it and where each

such paradox does not refer to

itself within itself, does that

list contain.. this paradox?

(But is this even a paradox?

And even if not, is it in

that list anyway?)

[I have NOT thought about this

question in any serious way...

or really at all.

My mind must thus contain,

MAYBE, the list of such

paradoxes?

Anyway, MAYBE there is

something SUPER-PROFOUND

in the {non-serious}

"paradox" I have stated

(non-paranthetically)

above.

But what about the list

of all paradoxes which

do not reference their own

{pseudo}profoundness within

them? Is the question of

whether this list contains

the very paradox herein

this very paragraph then

itself {pseudo}profound,

or is it not?... It is..

meta-{pseudo}profound!]

--------------------------------

--------------------------------

Suggested band-names:

'A Vicious Sphere'

'Shenanigans For Shut-Ins'

--------------------------------

(Singing lapses

lead to..

lip-synching.)

A suggested gimmick

for a professional singer:

The singer is a ventriloquist

who ACTUALLY sings during

live performances, but who

does not move his/her lips

(let alone lip-synch).

Anti-lip-synching,

in other words.

(Lapse-singing.)

(Lip-raising?)

(.. Slips inching{-up}.)

--------------------------------

Splitting a standing tree

vertically down its center,

and then removing one half,

will get you..

'a semi-tree',..

which is thus of..

'asymmetry'!..

(Although,

a group of many

'semi-trees'

might still possess

many 'symmetries',

geometric and/or

otherwise.)

--------------------------------

--------------------------------

(Regarding those sub-axioms..)

The mathematical analogs to

subatomic particles:..

Subaxiomatic particularities:

If there is a mathematical

proof that can be subdivided

between its steps,

between its lines, with

increasingly more basic and

rigorous lemmas/axioms each

supporting a step in the

previous iteration of this

lengthening proof -- so that

the proof as a whole is to

become increasingly more

certain as these sub-lemmas/

sub-axioms are interleaved

between the lemmas/axioms

of the previous iteration --

then maybe that mathematical

proof, after an infinite

number of such iterations,

becomes essentially..

a continuum,

ie. a continuous logical

(and infinitely complex)

structure of an infinite number

of supporting arguments each

supported by an infinite number

of supporting arguments

(.. ad-infinitum), arguments

which are more simple

and more certain at each

higher-order level than at the

levels of the previous orders.

(However, this likely would

not represent a 'continuum' in

the mathametical sense,

ironically. I am guessing that,

at most, the number of steps

would be of countable-infinity

{as large as the number of all

integers or fractions},

and would not possess the

cardinality of the set of

all real-numbers...

Not even close to being close.)

[Update: Whoops. Without thinking

too hard about it, I guess it IS

possible to get such a proof

that contains a number of steps

equal to the infinity which

equals the number of real numbers;

ie. the infinity of the continuum.

But,.. to do so would require

LOTS {an infinite amount} of

repetition of at least some of

the sub-lemmas/sub-axioms.

That is because the list of ALL

distinct proofs, lemmas, and axioms

which can be written in any language

with a finite character-set is of

a MUCH smaller infinity -- that of

the number of integers -- than is

the number of reals.

But if we wrote, say, 10 sub-lemmas

supporting each lemma on the level

above them, the number of all steps

in the proof would be as the number

of decimal fractions between 0 and

1, or in other words, the number of

proofs has the cardinality of the

reals. So the AVERAGE number of

times each subaxiom/sublemma is

repeated would have to be infinity,

quite a huge infinity, actually.

{Did I do that all^ correctly?}]

--------------------------------

--------------------------------

Now, the offensive stuff:..

[Warning: Rest may offend.]

It is fitting, I guess, that

many johns are loner-men,

...

since many prostitutes are,

essentially,.. loaner-women.

--------------------------------

As they say:

The only good [blank],

who is just-as-good-as-dead,

is a dead [blank],

who is just-as-good-as-dead.

[^You have carte-blanche

to fill in the 'blank'.]

--------------------------------

Some tongue-twisters:

(Your actual smileage may vary.)

"Those special spectra's

colorectal colors are

especially else as spectral."

"This is thus a trusted testament

to my rusty but trusty testes."

--------------------------------

Leroy

## No comments:

Post a Comment