Tuesday, May 27, 2014

Do Gel Truth, Turtle-God

Blog-post # 431:
(431 = a prime. Damn primes.)

Eight new hand-drawn inanimations:
[I am too hurried today to have
these titles be in color today.
But at least there indeed is
some "color" in the first title,
at least..]

Ironic Refractions Of Colors
Into Cosines.. Into Iridescence

Refractions Of Nothingnesses
Each Otherwise As Knotted

These Phaselessnesses Of A
Discontinuity Disturbed By
Its Own Invariance

Of Focal-Pointlessness'
Apex, Vertex, Vortex,
Nexus, Helix, And Crux

This Thus Of Its Inconsequences

A World So Fell;
All Flowers Do

Interspersed Between
The Infinities Are
These (Quasi)Finitudes

As Symmetries And Asymmetries
Alike And Also/Else Alternating

[The 6th image's name is
also an anagram below.]
(How many? 21;
And plenty fun are
these twenty-one.)

Motion's continuity:
Its monotonic unity.


I focus this.
It is of such.


Behind a void was a nil.
I so sever this.
Whatever is as hidden
is as oblivion.


Such discontinuities
are those of less.
Each is so,...
so thus is countered
in itself.


Once a knot ever
swirled conclusively.
Any lines revolved


The ironic refraction is
as those, and yet is seen.
Any science's rotations
are of this inside there.


Science's quality
almost remains always
of dim entirety.
It is inconsequential,
yet was formed as


Any eclipse seen in
its angles is obscured
by transparency.
Because, lenses spin,
yet are spinning
beyond clarity's arcs.


So spherical:
Pi's holes arc.


All is as the dire cone:
Its nodes are helical.


A horn's glow is real.
Rings are as hollow.


As what imagines self:
This false enigma was.


A world so fell.
All flowers do.

[^Also the name of
an image above.]

As asymmetries glow:
Glassy were most I am.


Any cosmic noises were in
any darkest inflections
... in time astir.
A randomness' entirety
is clockwise. Infinity
remains once as it.


Where so? It.


As a lie is of
nothingness' refractions
else soon mended:
Those are formed so
inside nonsense's
fictional angles.


Our sundial is as
this creation's glow.
So unidirectional
was its hourglass.


Sundials see:
A lens is used.


In the glassiness:
Night is as lenses.
(As nil sees things;
Seen: This signals.)


Lens' clarity.

[^This bottom anagram must
have been posted before,
and/or in-part the previous
one likely has been too.]

'Drat, such custard!'

'Trash's art.'

'Tennis: In net.'

'Do gel truth, Turtle-God.'


VERY small nuclear-powered
submarines must be quite..


Two riddles*:

Which type of chains and
links ironically DIVIDE
us from each other more
so than bind us together?

Those in...
chain-link fences!


Before their masters,
what is it that dogs
must always do?..


*(Each is a 'riddle' that
ironically does NOT..
'rid dullness'.)
[Warning, warning:
Somewhat risque.]

A strip-club is a type of
singles-bar, yes indeed..
But most of those singles
are small, flat, and..

(And these singles are
strips, too, I guess.
So yes, quite a
'strip'-club, indeed.)

[^Some old joke I heard
somewhere else before?]

I need a reoccurring
feature for my blog
called, "Things I MUST
Have Heard/Read Before,
But I Do Not Specifically
Recall Doing So (And I Am
Too Lazy To Look It Up)"**.

Such as:

(1) The statement:
"I was a screw-up,
but then I grew-up."

(2) Regarding the
crack-epidemic of a
couple decades ago,
especially in regards
to what was happening
in the African-American
community, here is a
buzz-phrase the media
could have used {or did}:
"Crack-on-Black violence".

(3) The US's FCC chairman
then says, after all the
"Ohhh!.. I was thinking
you people wanted

**[Or maybe I should instead
just rename my entire blog

Speaking of...
(maybe having heard/read
something before {which
definitely correlates
with something I have
indeed heard before,
and repeatedly so)..

Correlation does not
always cause causation,
it may correlate with it.

any causal relationships
aren't often correlating with
any casual relationships
{unless, after the fact,
.. whoops..}.]

Speaking of..
(correlations and stuff)..
[This is not so much funny,
than.. math-proof-like.]

All people are asinine jerks.
And all corporations
(and even all politicians)
are people, or so I hear.

So, therefore, thus,...


Quotes from stupid-people:

"You say your shirt is full
of holes? Why don't you then
just wear it inside-out,
you moron!?"

"Hey, you can't take a ride
in a time-machine, idiot,
'cause those haven't even
been invented yet!"



Like a new-moon at midnight;
Like the whitest laser-light;
Like how so politically wrong
is the political right;
All so is of what is quite
all this ironic.. oversight.


An aside:

Regarding concepts such as
"a new-moon at midnight",
"the whitest laser-light",
an "amorphous trapezoid",

I suppose I like oxymorons
that require more thought
to realize they are even
oxymoronic (even if these
examples here are each
very simple compared to,
say, some which could be
dreamt up by physicists
and mathematicians, and
which may be completely
non-understandable by
almost everyone).


The so-called "Riemann
Hypothesis" has stumped
mathematicians since 1859.

Yeah, Bernhard Riemann's
last name sure is apt,
then. Because that..

Mr Riemann

indeed was quite the..



Speaking of
'Misters' and 'Sirs':..

Since, 'surreal' sounds like
'Sir Real', I propose the
word 'mystereal', which
sounds like "Mr Real",
of course (and is based too
somewhat on the ending of
I guess this word is maybe
an adjective describing the
mysteriousness of surrealism
or of something like that,

[And unlike 'Mr Riousness'
has been, 'Sir Riousness' is
much too serious, however,
for any of this weirdness.]


Regarding the fun topics
both of "net-neutrality"
and of "neural-nets":

I wonder;..
If the internet was structured
like a giant brain, and this
architecture is what (using
AI) determined the amount of
bandwidth allocated to each
internet-user, then this,
I suppose, would be..


[But I am not saying that
the internet is necessarily
not structured in this way.]

Is the phrase
"The progression of aging"
quite the oxymoron?

If it is indeed a
progression, which implies
progress, then why do
people always want to
"halt" it?

Are these people luddites,
Are they conservatives,
Are they just into retro
fashions, technological
anachronism, and/or
past-life regressions,

From what I hear, growing
older is quite an example
of real-life entropy
which messes with one's
health, and is in no way
an act of "progression",
unless it is meant the
progression of bad things,
like sicknesses.

(So then, is this phrase used
so often because, as people
age, they very often become
more and more politically
progressive, then?...
Uh,.. not necessarily so,
I am guessing..)


Band-names (???):


But maybe "Warm Swarm"
would be a.. cooler.. name?

[Warning. Warning. Warning:
Politics and other
"nothings but fear-itself"
to fear.]

Safe at last! Safe at last!
Thank God Almighty,
we are safe at last!

[^And this is a nightmare,
I have been having...

I think --- paraphrasing FDR --
the only thing to fear is most
OTHER people's fear itself.
That fear seems to be leading
to quite the dystopia that _I_
fear (much more than I fear
terrorism, even).]

I have read [but from an
unreliable source] that,
allegedly, the new 9-11 memorial
has an extremely tacky gift-shop.
(Which may be more appropriate
in some ways than people would
like to admit..)


[Never forget,..
the tackiness of 9-11.
But.. it's a new world
after the 9-11 gift-shop!
Hey, the terrorists tacky-ed
ALL of 'merica on 9-11.]

So we attacked-back
with that tackiness.
"Take that!...
You terrible terrorists!"
Tacky tourists take that
(their terrible tackiness),
turning it into an attack
back 'gainst (then towards)
them terrorists and their
tremendously terrifying terror.
And terrorists can't take that
terribly terrific tackiness
with which the tacky tourists
attacked them back.

And that's a fact!
That's a terse fact, in-fact,
'bout the tremendously terrific
tourists of tactless tackiness
then turning-the-tables to
therefore attack back
'gainst them those there
terribly terrifying terrorists.

And those them tacky tourists
have been doin' that attackin'
{their tactical attackin'-back
they've been doin' like that}
.. like a kraken-on-crack!)..


From my previous post:

There are only two types
of people in the world.
(And here I am..
stereo-typing.. them.)


A correction,
somewhat so:

"Stereo-" does NOT literally
mean 'of two things {which are
side-by-side, as are stereo

Since words like "stere" and
"steradian" come from the Greek
"stereos", which means 'solid',
I am guessing then that the word
"stereophonic" comes from the
apparent 3-dimensionality of
the sound, not from there being
'two' speakers.
I am unsure how the word
"stereotype" was derived,
then; not that I would have
even if "stereo" actually
did mean "two".
(An additional meaning for
"stereotype" is a kind of
relief-plate used for
printing, however.)

It would seem that what one is
doing when they are representing
a person in their minds as a
stereotype is representing that
person as being 2-d, however,
without any 3-d "depth",
which is the exact opposite
of having to do with 'solidity'.
Although, many stereotypes are
indeed held quite..
solidly.. by some people.



Saturday, May 17, 2014

Beyond Zero Or Zeroness

Blog-post # 430:
(430 = 2*43*5.)

Nine new inanimations:

Ephemeral Hourglass:
Of Such Strands
More Than Sands

Suddenly Infinite;
As Finiteness' Own


Even One Cannot Evenly
Sever Everything By
Evenly Dividing Into It

Aperiodicities So Automated,
If Inanimately So

Each Dis-concentric

Of Dimensions' Dissimilarly
Finite Distances --
Of One, Then Three, Then Two

Between The Zeros
And The Zeronesses

In All Aspectlessness Of
Anything Are Aspects
Maybe As Mathematical

[Whoops, I already had an image
with a name somewhat similar to
"Between The Zeros And The
Zeronesses" in my previous post.]
(14 -- fourteen.)

This hourglass exists.
A helix's sight rusts so.


This pearl became this:
Hemispherical, at best.


Fewer loops are circled
less so than else is pi.
As ellipses and eclipses
were of their colors.


This yet created this
repetition yet inside this.
That periodicity is the
entirety then is its seed.


Space is oval;
or a sphere's tangent
is parallel.
As all overlapping spectra
are as those lines.


Math's abacus is of
these metaphors.
For, this sum so became
as that shape.


All vectors are shapes.
These scalars overlap.


As yellowish-reds
with orange:
A shadow's silly
green or white.


All is as the dire cone:
Its nodes are helical.


Utopian entirety:
Upon it, yet near it.


This rotation was less so
cosmically eternal here.
It is all as most.
As those wheels are
only incorrect.


Therefore, as in
a clearest lens,..
All these refractions
are seen.

[^I must have posted
something very close
to this anagram before,
maybe even multiple
times already.]





Perfect repetition without
any variation or deviation:



What do friends call
nameless people by?

Their 'nix-names'!..


The principle of cookie-entropy:

It becomes what it..

(And it cannot ever
be de-crumbled.)


I was wondering the other day..

Given the post-death decay of
dead people's teeth and gums,
and with the increased growth
of bacteria in their mouths due
to their body's disintegration,
and with their (obvious) lack
of tooth-brushing since dying,
I wonder then, do dead people
thus have bad-breath?"..

Then I soon realized,..

"Oh,.. No, no they do not."..


Love the phrase which is sometimes
used in news-reports when a dead
body has been found and foul-play
is suspected by the investigators:

It is.. "a suspicious death."

I get this image:..
hooded Death, with his sickle,
is so very very paranoid and
suspicious of everybody..
Everybody is out to get HIM, see,
and end all death with their
medical advancements and whatnot.
So he trusts nobody.
Yes,.. a very suspicious Death..


one's 'moral-failings'
can too often lead to
one's 'life-successes'.

(So life is immoral, then?
And thus, the MORAL thing to
do is to try to end all life
and lives?..
See, irony is fun!..)


Peter The Choker
is a cheater at poker.
He's a choker of the pips
and of the poker chips.
As he does the jacks of poker,
he also packs a joker.
And when he plays strip-poker,
he's a pip-stroker.

But when he plays his poker,
what's that he sips?
It's what he uses as a soaker
of both himself and those pips.

For, Peter, that 'card-hider',..
does sip/use...


Since the words "calculus" and
"calculate" etymologically both
come from the old word for small
stone (which is also related to
the word "calcium") [because of
the stones moved within abaci
to calculate sums long ago],...

then maybe, to be more logical,
the phrase "number-crunching"
should have instead been


The term "dial-up internet"
I have got to love, because
it literally it implying the
phone-connection is via a
phone with an olde-timey

Better yet, why not.. this?..

The internet-user tries to
log-on (analog-on) by, first,
quickly turning the crank on
his telephone-device, and then
yells into it, "Hello, operator!
Please get me the [so-and-so]
ISP at the [such-and-such]
telephone exchange!"

"Please [crackle, crackle], sir,
would you repeat that!?"

Then, finally with any luck,
the operator plugs the caller's
phono-jack into the ISP's input
on the big board before her;
and then and only then
does all become well.

("But you trendy kids just had
to go and get your newfangled
push-button phones, with their
beeps and their tones and
their spiffy buttons and


I don't do much social-network
crap online because.. (rather
than vice-versa) I prefer the
life I live to be more so real..

than is my name I must use..


An undrawn image:

A pearl lodged within
a venus-flytrap (as if,
but instead of, within
an oyster).

(A Venus persontrap?)


if Venus is on the half-shell,
as in that one famous painting,
but Mars is standing on another
half-shell, then which of these
half-shells is it that Venus
is standing upon?

The better-half, of course!


A chamber-pot is a..

nocturnal urinal.


I may have seen this somewhere
already, but a good nickname,


"I be attackin'..
like a kraken


There are only two types
of people in the world.
(And here I am..
stereo-typing.. them.)

The winners..
and the whiners.

Guess which side the good people
are almost always on, though!..

(But the bad people are
often of both types!)


[Warning: Politics!
Next three items may offend.]

America today: Where the
prisons are often more so
privately run..

than how privately the lives
of any free Americans are lived.

[More irony:
I am betting that there is
not much 'privacy' for any
prisoners in those so-called


Hey, I had a fun idea for an
email/social-media provider:

(^Unless the name already exists,
which it likely already does..
or surely will soon.)

Here are some screen-shots*
from their non-real promotion
(which exists only as a warning,
not as a handbook, as they say):

*[Bonus anagram:

Short scene.]

(Some polychromatism has been very
necessary for this blog, ever since
I had to stop making computer art
a half-year or so ago.
It is ironic that all this color
here is for a bunch of text,

Speaking of

Science vs Religion:

BOTH Science and
Religion are lies.

But Science is as the liar of the
famous "Liar's Paradox", claiming
all it has ever claimed (including
anything regarding its nature as
such a liar) is a lie.

However, Religion is as a liar
who claims to always be telling
the truth. Not always is religion
credible, therefore, but at least
it has been consistently logical,
if mostly only so on a..
higher level.

Science created the Paradox
which equals our Universe
(by both denying the universe
and also knowing it is so).
And that Paradox then (thus?)
created Religion.


One last thing today --
about circles.. again:

Some people who do math with
angles and circles use degrees
(360 per complete turn), while
some prefer to use radians
(2*pi per complete turn).

But I would like to see a world
where more often the unit of an
angle's measure was the fraction
the angle is of one complete
rotation around the circle.
So, 1 'circumferian' =
360 degrees,
which = 2*pi radians.

(A right angle would be of .25 or
1/4 circumferian, for example.
And the angles of an equilateral
triangle would each be of
1/6 a circumferian.)

There is a direct linear relation
between these 3 types of units,
so the conversions would be super

[Whoops, I see now that this unit
is also called a "full angle" or
"perigon". But I really like
my term, "circumferian", for it.]


Thursday, May 8, 2014

Ultidimensionally Multimate

Blog-post # 429:
(429 = 11*3*13.)

Nine inanimations.

Multimately Ultidimensional

A Knot Too Ornate
To Be As Recognized

Absolute Ambiguity Of
Circles Certainly Circular

Inwardly, Unto
Externally, And
Into Misplacement

Corollaries Of Collective

An Infinite Hourglass
Of Mis-Ticked Time

Galactic, Stellar,
Planetary, Lunar;
Pointy, Linear,
Shapely, Formed

The Ultimate Untying Of
Our Knot-like Universe

Between The Zeros
And Zeronesses
Ironically Positive

(19 = 'nine(e)teen in'.
[^Yet another
proximate palindrome.])

Mix of parallels:...
All as plexiform.


A glassiness was yet in
the inflections' sphere.
This clearest spinning
of these is always seen.


Real scene:
Seen clear.


Its sphere:
This, per-se.


The shadows are
of sundials per-se.
As true as shown
is a folded sphere.


As this fate, those
moon-dials were so.
Shadows are of that;
soon, time else is.


Solar-flares wind about.
All rainbows are of dust.


Coiling knots were
as rotation's lace.
A tangle is ornate
or is not clockwise.


Form ever twirls;
plus, again so
has pi.
Surrealism was of
this overlapping.


The one cusp is
of what this is.
Those shapes focus
within it.


Syzygies are as
multidimensional as this.
A string is, is a line,
is a sly maze they do sum.


The multidimensionalities:
They are less so.
Ultimately inside those
is more than else is.


To them, yet as in them,
are spun...
the many permutations.


As beyond this linearity:
Yet so inside a labyrinth.


The node forever
is inside mazes,..
If these dreams
envisioned zero.


One, two, three: Askew.
We were those: A knot.


I veto an id.


As what is in
every calculus' art:
This was universally


The atheism's creationism:
Mathematics so is therein.


'I made math; tamed am I.'

[^This palindrome seems very
familiar. Did I post it already?
But given that "palindrome"
literally means: {the letters}
'return' by 'running' along;
then fine.]
{And I surely have already
posted about how Sarah
Palin's last name is so very
appropriate, it seems to me,
for an extreme conservative's
name, given that 'palin' is
derived from the Greek for
'back' or 'return'. And I am
guessing that an etymological
connection must surely exist
between the prefix "palin-"
and the prefix "paleo-", where
the latter is derived from the
Greek for 'old/ancient'.}


(And quite odd, it is,
that I did not notice
until just a few days
ago that
'Doctor Rot-Cod'
is a palindrome.
The doctor has a..
'doctorate, yet a rot-cod',
or maybe a..
'doctorate, tarot-cod'.)

(That tarot-cod is much
like such terra-cotta.
But it is also maybe
like a tarot-card, but
else.. more so fishy..)

Now the funny(funnier) stuff...

Ironically, "peppering" someone
with rocks is a form of..



What was unfairly blamed for the
couple's accidental pregnancy?



[The era of fertilized
ova is defined by its..
'Zygote Zeitgeist'.
(That era has now come to an
end, because, I suppose, it is
already.. ova.)]

It is unfortunate that there
can be no fuchsia-colored
laser-light beams (because
fuchsia is never composed of
a single frequency on the
electromagnetic spectrum).

It is unfortunate because,
otherwise, energy-physicists
might have been successful
using such lasers
(of high-power) to ignite a..


(But, alas, no..)

Maybe the goddess of the
purest of wisdom would
herself doubt the
existence of any

If so, she and her followers
might be students in the
philosophy of...


(Does that "(na)" very much
mean 'not applicable' here?)

[From Greece to Rome..]

Caesar sees these seas;
So Caesar,
he seized these seas he sees.
Caesar was pleased by these seas,
these seas he sees then seized.

These seas indeed Caesar seized.
But of these seas he proceeds
to then free their breeze from
these fees he once teased
from all these seas he seized.
And these fees he'll ease
and likewise freeze,
as he did that freezing breeze;
because Caesar,.. he's appeased.


Global-warming is when nature
does.. seas.. the low-lying
coastlines back from humanity.


Where there's the..
that's where the..
land is dyin'.


When driving a truck
through a pasture,
you better use your..
to try to avoid that..


If "more clearly" and
"most clearly" are acceptable
to write, then why not
"clearerly" and "clearestly"?

(Would using these be..





If analog-clocks turn circle-wise;
then digital-clocks, thus, must
turn counter-circle-wise.


Why, long long ago, didn't our
ancestors question their belief
many had back then that the
Sun and Moon and stars move
across the inside of a giant
celestial dome...
if the Sun did not cast the
Moon's shadow onto the inside
of that dome whenever the Moon
was in the sky during the day?

I would have thought the
absence of such a shadow
would have been somewhat
obvious to most people.**

I bet some ancient people
indeed did question the
common view of the Cosmos;
but these particular people
were ridiculed as being
simply CrAzY...
(Or worse, they were often
banished and punished or
even tortured/executed for
being heretics.
Meanwhile, all their friends
were too apathetic about any
of this enforced ignorance,
because, hey, they, at least,
"have nothing to hide", as I
bet they claimed.. even in
those days.)

**[This would have been more
obvious to those people with
good enough vision to even
clearly see the Moon in the
sky during the day in the
first place, anyway.
As eyeglasses were not yet
invented, there were likely
a good number of people
who thought the day's Moon
was just a cloud, or maybe
was some glowing god or
angel or something.
{"Never mind, it's just
the Face Of God up there."}
But I read anyway that, even
with all the nearsighted
people amongst them, the
Ancients still were aware
somehow of the existence of
a handful of the planets
in our solar-system.
And why did these planets
also not cast shadows onto
the inside of the dome?
And what about the stars?
Although, as I think I have
been taught, some ancient
cultures may have believed
that the stars were affixed
directly to the dome; thus
that would explain the lack
of any shadows cast by our
Sun's light shining upon
{"So, it is settled, then.
The lack of the stars having
any shadows PROVES that they
are affixed DIRECTLY to the
celestial dome! QED."}]

{PS: To give the peoples
of long ago the benefit-of
-the-doubt as to why they
were not bothered by the
lack of the Moon's shadow
on the stars' dome:
As I understand it,
the outer celestial dome
was believed by many, but
not all, ancient cultures
to be more so a fluid than
a solid. Plus, that dome
was believed by many to
be VERY far away, even if
their estimates for the
distances from the Earth
to the stars were always
MUCH shorter than how
distant the stars actually
are from Earth.}



1st denomination.
2nd domination.
3rd dominion.
4th dimension..


The 'zero-times-infinity'
pseudo-mathematical rambling in
my April 22 blog-post (# 427):

Since my essay had zero-substance
or rigor, and since it is quite
meaningless (ie. it is of
indeterminate value), then
therefore, it is (and thus
I am) INFINITELY clever!..
(Because, infinity multiplied
by zero is indeterminate, see.)