Friday, September 13, 2013

Magnificationem Ad Absurdum

[Today's blog-post title, as
best as I can gather without
actually knowing Latin myself,
means "Magnification
To The Absurd
", which is (1) the
philosophical/logical/mathematical
conjecture-disproving technique of
"reductio ad absurdum" in-reverse;
(2) a comment about today's world
and where it is going.]

{And the Nothingness is so dense
-- infinitely so -- as to finally
collapse into.. a dimensionless
point of... Nothingness,..
a Nothingness of..
infinite density.}

Blog-post # 396:
(396 = 2*3*11*3*2.)


Eleven art inanimations:
(So, I guess it is appropriate
that the number of this post,
396, is 11 times a square,
since there are 11 square
images I have posted today...)

Enlightenment Beyond All
Philosophy; Understanding
Surpassing All Psychosis

Stellar Glassiness Sans
Such Scalar-lessness

Meaninglessness Likewise Of
What Else It Is Also Unlike

Unthinkable Axioms Of
Unimaginable Disprovability

Incommensurably As Unmeasurability
Compared To Uncomparability

Anathema To All
Antitheses Of Everything

Hyperdimensionality Dissolved
Inside Its Own Thirst

The Least Of Any
Non-Integer-like Zeros

In Exponentially
Inexplicable Simplicity

Sans The Zeronesses
Of Glassiness-lessness

As Enlightenment's...
Mental Things Seen

Yes, the last image's
title is an anagram.
(No, the first image's
title is not.)

Yes, the name of the 2nd
image and the name of the
10th image (2nd from last)
are somewhat similar, and
are so at least somewhat
intentionally.

----------------------------
----------------------------
Anagrams:
(Only 4.)


This loop thereof is as
indescribably simple to us.
=
It stirs because it forms
beyond all philosophies.

---

As sly enlightenment:
=
Mentally seen things.

---

A shape erases dreams,...
=
As spheres are as made.

---

Antithetical:
=
That, can it lie?

----------------------------
----------------------------

Question-point?
Exclamation-mark!

(Remarkably, an
exclamation-point makes
more than a simple point.
So, what's the point?
.. That it makes a mark;
while a period makes a point
{if questionably}, period.)

----------------------------

Rhumb-line on a hemisphere:

A 'loxo-dome'..

(Have I posted this one
already? If not, why not?)
----------------------------

But a loxodrome drawn on a
skewed square is a...

'rhumbus', of course.

(Of course, quite a spirally
but angularly jagged course.)

----------------------------

New portmanteau for you:
(Will it go... 'en-viral'?..)

'ENVIRONlightenment'

(Be kind to all the world
to achieve knowledge of all
the world,.. or something.)

[But what do I know?
Because I am only...
environMENTALLY-ILL..
{Crazy for the planet.}]

(^The above is for you
liberals, the more libertine
of you being so very...
'Not-Tea-{Party}'.)
----------------------------

"Man, this painful heart-attack
I'm having is really killing me.
... (Man, it LITERALLY is.)"

----------------------------

'Taking a nap' is being a...

'nap-napper'.

----------------------------

[Warning: Possible
offensiveness hereafter.]

I was wondering about the
phrase, "Taking a crap".

Of course, one doing this is
actually doing the opposite,
GIVING a crap (to the sewer).

But does anyone GIVE a crap
about the irony of this idiom?

Crap: Take it or give it.
(But neither too literally so,
I suggest...)

----------------------------

What we USAers
used to fear:

Pitbull terriers.


What we now fear:

Terror's bullshit.

----------------------------

Hard to understand
Christian scripture is:

'indescribiblical'..

----------------------------

Hey, let's now get offensive.
(But not so much..
.. diabolically biblical.
Let's not get THAT crazy..)

Atheists are...
Theocidal sane-men
(and -women).

[To paraphrase:
"Kill all the Gods;
Let sanity sort them out."]

(^Not as offensive, perhaps, as
'Genocidally Sideways Genitals',
but close.)

---

[Possible punk-rock girl's name:
'Jen O Sideways'.
(Her sister is named 'Sue E'.)
{I posted already about the
punk guy's name 'Arson Nick'?}]

----------------------------
[Warning: Really offensive...
But it needs to be said.*]

Big Pharma's drugs sometimes
have... 'sui-CIDE EFFECTS'.

(Leading ultimately, maybe,
to 'geno-cide-effects'??..
Come on; go BIG, Big-Pharma.)

*[Yes, it seems to me
that it is important..
I say something here
.. in poor taste.]

----------------------------

Seriously though, just know,
..
Genocide is suicide.

And our very much ongoing
collective self-harm is:

Mass-ochism.

----------------------------
----------------------------

Along with film/movie-making
(if, anyway, its creator is
involved significantly in all
aspects of creating the
film/movie), mathematics is
definitely one of the most
synesthetic of creative
endeavors (more or less so
depending upon the specific
subdiscipline, of course) --
combining many types of
thinking:
From graphical, to textual and
language (even a bit of poetry),
to whatever else can be thought
by either of the brain's
hemispheres.

(The Corpus Of Calculuses And
Sums Of Such A Corpus Callosum
...)

----------------------------

I am intrigued by the idea that in
other universes (or in other parts
or times of our own universe),
not only are the laws of physics
different than they are here,
but maybe also logic and pure/
abstract mathematics differ too.

These other logi-verses would
perhaps exist precisely because
they do not, and vice-versa.
Their existences might even
be so unthinkable that those
existences are incapable of
being imagined or pondered by
any of us. Yet, then what is
this which I have written
regarding this topic herein?...

But if you doubt my conjecture*,
consider that even here in THIS
universe and on our own Earth,
logic does not always at least
seem to act uniformly logical
(as evidences by a number of
paradoxes), nor do we as people
in this universe have a uniform
interpretation of what is
axiomatic and what is otherwise
absolutely ridiculous (as is
evidenced by human-history and
its politics, wars, religion,
bigotries, sciences, myths,
etcetera).

*["if you doubt my conjecture"
-- All this is an absurd
proposal, you say?
But it is not necessarily
absurd to the inhabitants
of some other logi-verses!]

And so, there might be other
logi-verses where logic is
either more OR MAYBE EVEN LESS
ridiculous than it is in our
own logi-verse.
But these other logi-verses'
existences might be proved
by their very disproving;
or conversely.
And these existences within the
collection of all logi-verses
might be anathema not only to
each other (making such a
multiplicity an impossibility..
and thus, maybe a certainty),
but also antithetical to
entirely everything...
(as too maybe our own
universe likewise is).

----------------------------

Leroy

No comments: