As themselves therein are they spirals.]

Blog-post # 410:

(410 = 2*41*5.)

Five new "scans"* of

pen-drawn inanimations:

*('Scannots?' --

See my recent posts for why they are so ugly.)

UnCounterclockwise;

Likewise Unlike Cosines

Itemized Linearities

Of Delineated Curvatures

Introspective Inflections

Of Perfectnesses

Unto Underwhelming

Universes Underway

Yet This Yet Is As

That Math That Is Thus

-----------------------------

-----------------------------

Anagrams:

(18 -- one is 5-part,

and one is 3-part.)

The winter season:

=

In weather's tones.

=

There, snow is neat.

=

(Then, it now erases

=

.. its own earth seen.)

[^In honor of the

solstice a few days

ago. Xmas-related

anagrams below.]

---

These transpositions

in us:

=

Nonsense is apt,

or it thus is.

---

As the diffraction

rotates more;..

=

Its creations are

formed of that.

---

Spiral things are all also hewn

or else made into everything.

=

As any real sigmoidal lengths

overlap their own lines there.

---

Spins are sigmoidal,..

=

Spirals so imagined.

---

Celestial images are

mostly linear;

=

As electromagnetism

is really a lie.

---

In the sleep, a cosmos'

celestial energy:

=

Electromagnetic shape

is solely seen.

---

These limits are

as tangents of

weirdest curls.

=

Their fate was

misled to its

cruel strangeness.

---

The entirety was geometric;

as anything is fluid.

=

Yet images created their

own insightful sanity.

---

Opine:

=

I 'Nope'.

---

These videos imagined.

=

The movies aged inside.

---

Video dreams:

=

Movies' dread.

---

Circular sums total

to pi, into nil.

=

Multiplications'

rotations curl.

---

Solstice:

=

Lost ices.

[^Did I already

publish this one?]

---

Christmas:

=

Its charms:

=

Trims cash.

---

Its Psycho-Christmas;

a lie.

=

As this hypocritical mess.

---

Saturnalian:

=

An altar in us.

---

Any universe's altar is..

=

.. every sins' Saturnalia.

-----------------------------

-----------------------------

Palindromes:

'"One?" "None, no.",

or:..

'"One?" "No one, no."'

[A weirdest palindrome:..]

'Snort:

Celestial uvula;

its electrons.'

-----------------------------

That last palindrome is the

album-name of the non-real

band..

'Celestron-Macroscope'.

(Another band-name, but

not at all original:

'Black-Light Blight'.)

---------------

A 'celestron':

Electrons each the

size of the universe?

Or simply electrons

of celestial origin?

(Quite quasi.)

-----------------------------

Very very big/huge

hollow/curved pasta:

'Macro-oni'.

{^Very very unoriginal pun.}

-----------------------------

We are surely doomed if even

a single purely mathematical

sine-wave starts getting all

aperiodic and weird on us;

... as that would surely be

quite a... 'bad-sine'.

(Sinful sinusoids:

They are quite the

noncon-

*formulaic*

*fun*-ctions.)

-----------------------------

"Them Brits and their metric

system. Hey, how much is a

metric ton worth in America?"

"Now days, a bit more

than 3600 US dollars."

(^You might .. pound..

yourself in the head for not

getting this one right away.)

-----------------------------

(We bit more off than a

bit more than we can chew.

Were we a bit more off

than a bit off?)

-----------------------------

War-mongering

elected officials:

'im

*polit*e-

*icians*'.

-----------------------------

-----------------------------

Ironically, positive numbers

were 'discovered' by humanity

before negative numbers were.

Yet, numerically, the negative

numbers come before positive

numbers, of course.

And, furthermore, the idea

of mathematical infinity was

conceived at a time before

forever from now.

Yet once, the idea of the

mathematical zero was

nonexistent.

(Although the general idea of

absence has always existed:

"Me have 'zero' meat to eat

stored here in my cave, ug.")

-----------------------------

What if science and reality

are so such that all physical

quantities are finite and

quantal?

What if infinity exists in

no scientific way at all?

Then maybe zero (somewhat

defined, if non-rigorously,

as infinity's reciprocal)

does not exist either.

And then maybe no quantity

at all, then, is exactly

definable

(since any x, precisely

defined, would otherwise

be equal to x + 0).

And that is why all

is blurry and uncertain.

... even this very

'proof' herein.

(Which probably falsely

gives laypeople the idea

that the Uncertainty

of quantum-physics may

necessarily apply to

EVERYTHING. I am not

being rigorous here -- but

is there even such a thing

as rigor at all, in

mathematics or anywhere?)

QED

Quite Erroneous Demonstration

or

Quasi-Erroneous Derivation?

-----------------------------

Leroy

## No comments:

Post a Comment