Do Gel Truth, Turtle-God

Blog-post # 431:
(431 = a prime. Damn primes.)

Eight new hand-drawn inanimations:
[I am too hurried today to have
these titles be in color today.
But at least there indeed is
some "color" in the first title,
at least..]

Ironic Refractions Of Colors
Into Cosines.. Into Iridescence

Refractions Of Nothingnesses
Each Otherwise As Knotted

These Phaselessnesses Of A
Discontinuity Disturbed By
Its Own Invariance

Of Focal-Pointlessness'
Apex, Vertex, Vortex,
Nexus, Helix, And Crux

This Thus Of Its Inconsequences

A World So Fell;
All Flowers Do

Interspersed Between
The Infinities Are
These (Quasi)Finitudes

As Symmetries And Asymmetries
Alike And Also/Else Alternating

[The 6th image's name is
also an anagram below.]
-----------------------------
-----------------------------
Anagrams:
(How many? 21;
And plenty fun are
these twenty-one.)


Motion's continuity:
=
Its monotonic unity.

---

I focus this.
=
It is of such.

---

Behind a void was a nil.
I so sever this.
=
Whatever is as hidden
is as oblivion.

---

Such discontinuities
are those of less.
=
Each is so,...
so thus is countered
in itself.

---

Once a knot ever
swirled conclusively.
=
Any lines revolved
counterclockwise.

---

The ironic refraction is
as those, and yet is seen.
=
Any science's rotations
are of this inside there.

---

Science's quality
almost remains always
of dim entirety.
=
It is inconsequential,
yet was formed as
asymmetrically.

---

Any eclipse seen in
its angles is obscured
by transparency.
=
Because, lenses spin,
yet are spinning
beyond clarity's arcs.

---

So spherical:
=
Pi's holes arc.

---

All is as the dire cone:
=
Its nodes are helical.

---

A horn's glow is real.
=
Rings are as hollow.

---

As what imagines self:
=
This false enigma was.

---

A world so fell.
=
All flowers do.


[^Also the name of
an image above.]
---

As asymmetries glow:
=
Glassy were most I am.

---

Any cosmic noises were in
any darkest inflections
... in time astir.
=
A randomness' entirety
is clockwise. Infinity
remains once as it.

---

Otherwise:
=
Where so? It.

---

As a lie is of
nothingness' refractions
else soon mended:
=
Those are formed so
inside nonsense's
fictional angles.

---

Our sundial is as
this creation's glow.
=
So unidirectional
was its hourglass.

---

Sundials see:
=
A lens is used.

---

In the glassiness:
=
Night is as lenses.
=
(As nil sees things;
=
Seen: This signals.)

---

Crystalline:
=
Lens' clarity.


[^This bottom anagram must
have been posted before,
and/or in-part the previous
one likely has been too.]
-----------------------------
-----------------------------
Palindromes:

'Drat, such custard!'

'Trash's art.'

'Tennis: In net.'

'Do gel truth, Turtle-God.'

-----------------------------
-----------------------------

VERY small nuclear-powered
submarines must be quite..

'sub-atomic'!

-----------------------------
Two riddles*:

Which type of chains and
links ironically DIVIDE
us from each other more
so than bind us together?

Those in...
chain-link fences!

---------------------

Before their masters,
what is it that dogs
must always do?..

BOW-wow DOWN!


*(Each is a 'riddle' that
ironically does NOT..
'rid dullness'.)
-----------------------------
[Warning, warning:
Somewhat risque.]

A strip-club is a type of
singles-bar, yes indeed..
But most of those singles
are small, flat, and..
rectangular.

(And these singles are
strips, too, I guess.
So yes, quite a
'strip'-club, indeed.)

[^Some old joke I heard
somewhere else before?]
-----------------------------
-----------------------------

I need a reoccurring
feature for my blog
called, "Things I MUST
Have Heard/Read Before,
But I Do Not Specifically
Recall Doing So (And I Am
Too Lazy To Look It Up)"**.

Such as:

(1) The statement:
"I was a screw-up,
but then I grew-up."

(2) Regarding the
crack-epidemic of a
couple decades ago,
especially in regards
to what was happening
in the African-American
community, here is a
buzz-phrase the media
could have used {or did}:
"Crack-on-Black violence".

(3) The US's FCC chairman
then says, after all the
public-comment:
"Ohhh!.. I was thinking
you people wanted
net-NEUTERIZATION!"...


**[Or maybe I should instead
just rename my entire blog
this?]
-----------------------------

Speaking of...
(maybe having heard/read
something before {which
definitely correlates
with something I have
indeed heard before,
and repeatedly so)..


Correlation does not
always cause causation,
but..
it may correlate with it.


[But,..
any causal relationships
aren't often correlating with
any casual relationships
{unless, after the fact,
.. whoops..}.]
-----------------------------

Speaking of..
(correlations and stuff)..
[This is not so much funny,
than.. math-proof-like.]


All people are asinine jerks.
And all corporations
(and even all politicians)
are people, or so I hear.

So, therefore, thus,...

-----------------------------

Quotes from stupid-people:

"You say your shirt is full
of holes? Why don't you then
just wear it inside-out,
you moron!?"

"Hey, you can't take a ride
in a time-machine, idiot,
'cause those haven't even
been invented yet!"

-----------------------------
-----------------------------

Oversight
---

Like a new-moon at midnight;
Like the whitest laser-light;
Like how so politically wrong
is the political right;
All so is of what is quite
all this ironic.. oversight.

---------------------

An aside:

Regarding concepts such as
"a new-moon at midnight",
"the whitest laser-light",
an "amorphous trapezoid",
etcetera,..

I suppose I like oxymorons
that require more thought
to realize they are even
oxymoronic (even if these
examples here are each
very simple compared to,
say, some which could be
dreamt up by physicists
and mathematicians, and
which may be completely
non-understandable by
almost everyone).

-----------------------------

The so-called "Riemann
Hypothesis" has stumped
mathematicians since 1859.

Yeah, Bernhard Riemann's
last name sure is apt,
then. Because that..

Mr Riemann

indeed was quite the..

Mystery-Man!..

-----------------------------

Speaking of
'Misters' and 'Sirs':..

Since, 'surreal' sounds like
'Sir Real', I propose the
word 'mystereal', which
sounds like "Mr Real",
of course (and is based too
somewhat on the ending of
'ethereal').
I guess this word is maybe
an adjective describing the
mysteriousness of surrealism
or of something like that,
perhaps?

[And unlike 'Mr Riousness'
has been, 'Sir Riousness' is
much too serious, however,
for any of this weirdness.]

-----------------------------

Regarding the fun topics
both of "net-neutrality"
and of "neural-nets":

I wonder;..
If the internet was structured
like a giant brain, and this
architecture is what (using
AI) determined the amount of
bandwidth allocated to each
internet-user, then this,
I suppose, would be..

'net-neurality'.


[But I am not saying that
the internet is necessarily
not structured in this way.]
-----------------------------

Is the phrase
"The progression of aging"
quite the oxymoron?

If it is indeed a
progression, which implies
progress, then why do
people always want to
"halt" it?

Are these people luddites,
then?
Are they conservatives,
then?
Are they just into retro
fashions, technological
anachronism, and/or
past-life regressions,
then?

From what I hear, growing
older is quite an example
of real-life entropy
which messes with one's
health, and is in no way
an act of "progression",
unless it is meant the
progression of bad things,
like sicknesses.

(So then, is this phrase used
so often because, as people
age, they very often become
more and more politically
progressive, then?...
Uh,.. not necessarily so,
I am guessing..)

-----------------------------
-----------------------------

Band-names (???):

"Luke-Swarm"?

But maybe "Warm Swarm"
would be a.. cooler.. name?

-----------------------------
-----------------------------
[Warning. Warning. Warning:
Politics and other
"nothings but fear-itself"
to fear.]

Safe at last! Safe at last!
Thank God Almighty,
we are safe at last!

[^And this is a nightmare,
I have been having...

I think --- paraphrasing FDR --
the only thing to fear is most
OTHER people's fear itself.
That fear seems to be leading
to quite the dystopia that _I_
fear (much more than I fear
terrorism, even).]


I have read [but from an
unreliable source] that,
allegedly, the new 9-11 memorial
has an extremely tacky gift-shop.
(Which may be more appropriate
in some ways than people would
like to admit..)

So,..

[Never forget,..
the tackiness of 9-11.
But.. it's a new world
after the 9-11 gift-shop!
'Tacky-orism':
Hey, the terrorists tacky-ed
ALL of 'merica on 9-11.]


So we attacked-back
with that tackiness.
"Take that!...
You terrible terrorists!"
Tacky tourists take that
(their terrible tackiness),
turning it into an attack
back 'gainst (then towards)
them terrorists and their
tremendously terrifying terror.
And terrorists can't take that
terribly terrific tackiness
with which the tacky tourists
attacked them back.

And that's a fact!
That's a terse fact, in-fact,
'bout the tremendously terrific
tourists of tactless tackiness
then turning-the-tables to
therefore attack back
'gainst them those there
terribly terrifying terrorists.

(Fact{!}:
And those them tacky tourists
have been doin' that attackin'
{their tactical attackin'-back
they've been doin' like that}
.. like a kraken-on-crack!)..

-----------------------------
-----------------------------

From my previous post:

There are only two types
of people in the world.
(And here I am..
stereo-typing.. them.)
...

A correction,
somewhat so:

"Stereo-" does NOT literally
mean 'of two things {which are
side-by-side, as are stereo
speakers}'.

Since words like "stere" and
"steradian" come from the Greek
"stereos", which means 'solid',
I am guessing then that the word
"stereophonic" comes from the
apparent 3-dimensionality of
the sound, not from there being
'two' speakers.
I am unsure how the word
"stereotype" was derived,
then; not that I would have
even if "stereo" actually
did mean "two".
(An additional meaning for
"stereotype" is a kind of
relief-plate used for
printing, however.)

It would seem that what one is
doing when they are representing
a person in their minds as a
stereotype is representing that
person as being 2-d, however,
without any 3-d "depth",
which is the exact opposite
of having to do with 'solidity'.
Although, many stereotypes are
indeed held quite..
solidly.. by some people.

-----------------------------

Leroy

Beyond Zero Or Zeroness

Blog-post # 430:
(430 = 2*43*5.)

Nine new inanimations:

Ephemeral Hourglass:
Of Such Strands
More Than Sands

Suddenly Infinite;
As Finiteness' Own
Self-Dissimilarities

Infra-finite

Even One Cannot Evenly
Sever Everything By
Evenly Dividing Into It

Aperiodicities So Automated,
If Inanimately So

Discontinuities
Each Dis-concentric

Of Dimensions' Dissimilarly
Finite Distances --
Of One, Then Three, Then Two

Between The Zeros
And The Zeronesses

In All Aspectlessness Of
Anything Are Aspects
Maybe As Mathematical

[Whoops, I already had an image
with a name somewhat similar to
"Between The Zeros And The
Zeronesses" in my previous post.]
--------------------------------
--------------------------------
Anagrams:
(14 -- fourteen.)


This hourglass exists.
=
A helix's sight rusts so.

---

This pearl became this:
=
Hemispherical, at best.

---

Fewer loops are circled
less so than else is pi.
=
As ellipses and eclipses
were of their colors.

---

This yet created this
repetition yet inside this.
=
That periodicity is the
entirety then is its seed.

---

Space is oval;
or a sphere's tangent
is parallel.
=
As all overlapping spectra
are as those lines.

---

Math's abacus is of
these metaphors.
=
For, this sum so became
as that shape.

---

All vectors are shapes.
=
These scalars overlap.

---

As yellowish-reds
with orange:
=
A shadow's silly
green or white.

---

All is as the dire cone:
=
Its nodes are helical.

---

Utopian entirety:
=
Upon it, yet near it.

---

This rotation was less so
cosmically eternal here.
=
It is all as most.
As those wheels are
only incorrect.

---

Therefore, as in
a clearest lens,..
=
All these refractions
are seen.


[^I must have posted
something very close
to this anagram before,
maybe even multiple
times already.]
---

Periodicity:
=
Tripe-idiocy.

---

Index:
=
Nixed.

--------------------------------
--------------------------------

Perfect repetition without
any variation or deviation:

'Pure-iodicity'.

--------------------------------

What do friends call
nameless people by?

Their 'nix-names'!..

--------------------------------

The principle of cookie-entropy:

It becomes what it..
be-crumbs..

(And it cannot ever
be de-crumbled.)

--------------------------------
--------------------------------

I was wondering the other day..

"Hmm,..
Given the post-death decay of
dead people's teeth and gums,
and with the increased growth
of bacteria in their mouths due
to their body's disintegration,
and with their (obvious) lack
of tooth-brushing since dying,
...
I wonder then, do dead people
thus have bad-breath?"..

Then I soon realized,..

"Oh,.. No, no they do not."..

--------------------------------

Love the phrase which is sometimes
used in news-reports when a dead
body has been found and foul-play
is suspected by the investigators:

It is.. "a suspicious death."

I get this image:..
Yes,
hooded Death, with his sickle,
is so very very paranoid and
suspicious of everybody..
Everybody is out to get HIM, see,
and end all death with their
medical advancements and whatnot.
So he trusts nobody.
Yes,.. a very suspicious Death..

--------------------------------

Ironically,
one's 'moral-failings'
can too often lead to
one's 'life-successes'.


(So life is immoral, then?
And thus, the MORAL thing to
do is to try to end all life
and lives?..
See, irony is fun!..)

--------------------------------
--------------------------------

Peter The Choker
is a cheater at poker.
He's a choker of the pips
and of the poker chips.
As he does the jacks of poker,
he also packs a joker.
And when he plays strip-poker,
he's a pip-stroker.

But when he plays his poker,
what's that he sips?
It's what he uses as a soaker
of both himself and those pips.

For, Peter, that 'card-hider',..
does sip/use...
(???)

--------------------------------
--------------------------------
Word-seriousness:

Since the words "calculus" and
"calculate" etymologically both
come from the old word for small
stone (which is also related to
the word "calcium") [because of
the stones moved within abaci
to calculate sums long ago],...

then maybe, to be more logical,
the phrase "number-crunching"
should have instead been
"number-crushing"?

--------------------------------
--------------------------------

The term "dial-up internet"
I have got to love, because
it literally it implying the
phone-connection is via a
phone with an olde-timey
rotary-dial.

Better yet, why not.. this?..

The internet-user tries to
log-on (analog-on) by, first,
quickly turning the crank on
his telephone-device, and then
yells into it, "Hello, operator!
Please get me the [so-and-so]
ISP at the [such-and-such]
telephone exchange!"

Operator:
"Please [crackle, crackle], sir,
would you repeat that!?"

Then, finally with any luck,
the operator plugs the caller's
phono-jack into the ISP's input
on the big board before her;
and then and only then
does all become well.

("But you trendy kids just had
to go and get your newfangled
push-button phones, with their
beeps and their tones and
their spiffy buttons and
whatnots.")

--------------------------------

I don't do much social-network
crap online because.. (rather
than vice-versa) I prefer the
life I live to be more so real..

than is my name I must use..

--------------------------------
--------------------------------
Seriously:

An undrawn image:

A pearl lodged within
a venus-flytrap (as if,
but instead of, within
an oyster).

(A Venus persontrap?)

----

So,..
if Venus is on the half-shell,
as in that one famous painting,
but Mars is standing on another
half-shell, then which of these
half-shells is it that Venus
is standing upon?

The better-half, of course!

--------------------------------
--------------------------------

A chamber-pot is a..

nocturnal urinal.

--------------------------------

I may have seen this somewhere
already, but a good nickname,
maybe:

"Kraken-On-Crack".

"I be attackin'..
like a kraken
-(on-crack)."

--------------------------------
--------------------------------

There are only two types
of people in the world.
(And here I am..
stereo-typing.. them.)

The winners..
and the whiners.

Guess which side the good people
are almost always on, though!..

(But the bad people are
often of both types!)

--------------------------------

[Warning: Politics!
Warning:
Next three items may offend.]


America today: Where the
prisons are often more so
privately run..

than how privately the lives
of any free Americans are lived.

[More irony:
I am betting that there is
not much 'privacy' for any
prisoners in those so-called
"private-prisons".]

--------------------------------

Hey, I had a fun idea for an
email/social-media provider:

"Blabsurdness.com".
(^Unless the name already exists,
which it likely already does..
or surely will soon.)

Here are some screen-shots*
from their non-real promotion
(which exists only as a warning,
not as a handbook, as they say):

*[Bonus anagram:

Screen-shot:
=
Short scene.]

(Some polychromatism has been very
necessary for this blog, ever since
I had to stop making computer art
a half-year or so ago.
It is ironic that all this color
here is for a bunch of text,
however.)
--------------------------------

Speaking of
schizonoid-paraphrenia...

Science vs Religion:

BOTH Science and
Religion are lies.

But Science is as the liar of the
famous "Liar's Paradox", claiming
all it has ever claimed (including
anything regarding its nature as
such a liar) is a lie.

However, Religion is as a liar
who claims to always be telling
the truth. Not always is religion
credible, therefore, but at least
it has been consistently logical,
if mostly only so on a..
higher level.

Science created the Paradox
which equals our Universe
(by both denying the universe
and also knowing it is so).
And that Paradox then (thus?)
created Religion.

--------------------------------

One last thing today --
about circles.. again:

Some people who do math with
angles and circles use degrees
(360 per complete turn), while
some prefer to use radians
(2*pi per complete turn).

But I would like to see a world
where more often the unit of an
angle's measure was the fraction
the angle is of one complete
rotation around the circle.
So, 1 'circumferian' =
360 degrees,
which = 2*pi radians.

(A right angle would be of .25 or
1/4 circumferian, for example.
And the angles of an equilateral
triangle would each be of
1/6 a circumferian.)

There is a direct linear relation
between these 3 types of units,
so the conversions would be super
easy.

[Whoops, I see now that this unit
is also called a "full angle" or
"perigon". But I really like
my term, "circumferian", for it.]
--------------------------------

Leroy

Ultidimensionally Multimate

Blog-post # 429:
(429 = 11*3*13.)

Nine inanimations.

Multimately Ultidimensional

A Knot Too Ornate
To Be As Recognized

Absolute Ambiguity Of
Circles Certainly Circular

Inwardly, Unto
Externally, And
Into Misplacement

Corollaries Of Collective
Convergencelessness

An Infinite Hourglass
Of Mis-Ticked Time

Galactic, Stellar,
Planetary, Lunar;
Pointy, Linear,
Shapely, Formed

The Ultimate Untying Of
Our Knot-like Universe

Between The Zeros
And Zeronesses
Ironically Positive

---------------------------------
---------------------------------
Anagrams:
(19 = 'nine(e)teen in'.
[^Yet another
proximate palindrome.])


Mix of parallels:...
=
All as plexiform.

---

A glassiness was yet in
the inflections' sphere.
=
This clearest spinning
of these is always seen.

---

Real scene:
=
Seen clear.

---

Its sphere:
=
This, per-se.

---

The shadows are
of sundials per-se.
=
As true as shown
is a folded sphere.

---

As this fate, those
moon-dials were so.
=
Shadows are of that;
soon, time else is.

---

Solar-flares wind about.
=
All rainbows are of dust.

---

Coiling knots were
as rotation's lace.
=
A tangle is ornate
or is not clockwise.

---

Form ever twirls;
plus, again so
has pi.
=
Surrealism was of
this overlapping.

---

The one cusp is
of what this is.
=
Those shapes focus
within it.

---

Syzygies are as
multidimensional as this.
=
A string is, is a line,
is a sly maze they do sum.

---

The multidimensionalities:
They are less so.
=
Ultimately inside those
is more than else is.

---

To them, yet as in them,
are spun...
=
These,
the many permutations.

---

As beyond this linearity:
=
Yet so inside a labyrinth.

---

The node forever
is inside mazes,..
=
If these dreams
envisioned zero.

---

One, two, three: Askew.
=
We were those: A knot.


---

Deviation:
=
Anti-video.
=
I veto an id.

---

As what is in
every calculus' art:
=
This was universally
accurate.

---

The atheism's creationism:
=
Mathematics so is therein.

---------------------------------
---------------------------------
Palindrome:

'I made math; tamed am I.'


[^This palindrome seems very
familiar. Did I post it already?
But given that "palindrome"
literally means: {the letters}
'return' by 'running' along;
then fine.]
{And I surely have already
posted about how Sarah
Palin's last name is so very
appropriate, it seems to me,
for an extreme conservative's
name, given that 'palin' is
derived from the Greek for
'back' or 'return'. And I am
guessing that an etymological
connection must surely exist
between the prefix "palin-"
and the prefix "paleo-", where
the latter is derived from the
Greek for 'old/ancient'.}

---

(And quite odd, it is,
that I did not notice
until just a few days
ago that
'Doctor Rot-Cod'
is a palindrome.
The doctor has a..
'doctorate, yet a rot-cod',
or maybe a..
'doctorate, tarot-cod'.)

(That tarot-cod is much
like such terra-cotta.
But it is also maybe
like a tarot-card, but
else.. more so fishy..)

---------------------------------
---------------------------------
Now the funny(funnier) stuff...


Ironically, "peppering" someone
with rocks is a form of..
'a-salt'*..

*(Rock-salt?)

---------------------------------

What was unfairly blamed for the
couple's accidental pregnancy?

Their...

scape-(zye)gote..


[The era of fertilized
ova is defined by its..
'Zygote Zeitgeist'.
(That era has now come to an
end, because, I suppose, it is
already.. ova.)]
---------------------------------

It is unfortunate that there
can be no fuchsia-colored
laser-light beams (because
fuchsia is never composed of
a single frequency on the
electromagnetic spectrum).

It is unfortunate because,
otherwise, energy-physicists
might have been successful
using such lasers
(of high-power) to ignite a..

'FUCHSIAn'-reaction..


(But, alas, no..)
---------------------------------

Maybe the goddess of the
purest of wisdom would
herself doubt the
existence of any
gods/goddesses?

If so, she and her followers
might be students in the
philosophy of...

'Athe(na)-ism'.

(Does that "(na)" very much
mean 'not applicable' here?)

---------------------------------
---------------------------------
[From Greece to Rome..]


Caesar sees these seas;
So Caesar,
he seized these seas he sees.
Caesar was pleased by these seas,
these seas he sees then seized.

These seas indeed Caesar seized.
But of these seas he proceeds
to then free their breeze from
these fees he once teased
from all these seas he seized.
And these fees he'll ease
and likewise freeze,
as he did that freezing breeze;
because Caesar,.. he's appeased.

---------------------------------

Global-warming is when nature
does.. seas.. the low-lying
coastlines back from humanity.

---------------------------------

Where there's the..
dandelion,
..
that's where the..
land is dyin'.

---------------------------------

When driving a truck
through a pasture,
you better use your..
steering-maneuver
to try to avoid that..
steer-manure.

---------------------------------
---------------------------------
Seriously:

If "more clearly" and
"most clearly" are acceptable
to write, then why not
"clearerly" and "clearestly"?

(Would using these be..
unclear?)

---------------------------------

Band-name:

'Stasis-Quo'

---------------------------------
---------------------------------

If analog-clocks turn circle-wise;
then digital-clocks, thus, must
turn counter-circle-wise.

---------------------------------
---------------------------------

Why, long long ago, didn't our
ancestors question their belief
many had back then that the
Sun and Moon and stars move
across the inside of a giant
celestial dome...
if the Sun did not cast the
Moon's shadow onto the inside
of that dome whenever the Moon
was in the sky during the day?

I would have thought the
absence of such a shadow
would have been somewhat
obvious to most people.**

I bet some ancient people
indeed did question the
common view of the Cosmos;
but these particular people
were ridiculed as being
simply CrAzY...
(Or worse, they were often
banished and punished or
even tortured/executed for
being heretics.
Meanwhile, all their friends
were too apathetic about any
of this enforced ignorance,
because, hey, they, at least,
"have nothing to hide", as I
bet they claimed.. even in
those days.)

**[This would have been more
obvious to those people with
good enough vision to even
clearly see the Moon in the
sky during the day in the
first place, anyway.
As eyeglasses were not yet
invented, there were likely
a good number of people
who thought the day's Moon
was just a cloud, or maybe
was some glowing god or
angel or something.
{"Never mind, it's just
the Face Of God up there."}
But I read anyway that, even
with all the nearsighted
people amongst them, the
Ancients still were aware
somehow of the existence of
a handful of the planets
in our solar-system.
And why did these planets
also not cast shadows onto
the inside of the dome?
And what about the stars?
Although, as I think I have
been taught, some ancient
cultures may have believed
that the stars were affixed
directly to the dome; thus
that would explain the lack
of any shadows cast by our
Sun's light shining upon
them.
{"So, it is settled, then.
The lack of the stars having
any shadows PROVES that they
are affixed DIRECTLY to the
celestial dome! QED."}]

{PS: To give the peoples
of long ago the benefit-of
-the-doubt as to why they
were not bothered by the
lack of the Moon's shadow
on the stars' dome:
As I understand it,
the outer celestial dome
was believed by many, but
not all, ancient cultures
to be more so a fluid than
a solid. Plus, that dome
was believed by many to
be VERY far away, even if
their estimates for the
distances from the Earth
to the stars were always
MUCH shorter than how
distant the stars actually
are from Earth.}

---------------------------------

Progression:

The:...
1st denomination.
The:...
2nd domination.
The:...
3rd dominion.
The:...
4th dimension..

---------------------------------
---------------------------------

Regarding:
The 'zero-times-infinity'
pseudo-mathematical rambling in
my April 22 blog-post (# 427):

Since my essay had zero-substance
or rigor, and since it is quite
meaningless (ie. it is of
indeterminate value), then
therefore, it is (and thus
I am) INFINITELY clever!..
(Because, infinity multiplied
by zero is indeterminate, see.)

QED.

---------------------------------
---------------------------------

Leroy

Amorphous Glyphs

Glyphs More Amorphous:

[Heretical hieroglyphs:
Too surreal to be seen
{and thus, they are
envisioned by us}.
Too surreal to be read
{and thus, they are
engraved into us}.
Too surreal to be real
{and thus, they are
entangled within us}.
Too surreal to be known
{and thus, they must
have enlighted us}.]

Post # 428:
(428 = 2*107*2.)

Eight new inanimations:

As Clockwise As
Counterclockwise,
As Rotation
Unequal To Rotation

Circumferenceless Circularity

Surrealistic Axioms

Eclipses Of Moons Each
Both Crescent And Gibbous

Hexa-Dimensional Hemispheres

The Trigonometric Glassiness
Of Particulate Translucence

Likewise As Knots
Of Knot-lessness

Counterintuitively Clockwise
Around Roundness'
Counterclockwise Intuition

[The bottom image,
"Counterintuitively Clockwise
Around Roundness' Counterclockwise
Intuition", is yet another image
of mine which may have been
unintentionally inspired by
Lorenz Attractors;.. I am
quite attracted to these
Lorenz attractors indeed,
it seems.]

[Oh, and I also seem to like to
often use the words "clockwise"
and "counterclockwise" as part
of my images' names.]
----------------------------------
----------------------------------
Anagrams:
(13 -- Ah, the luck of the irony.]


Weakest folds
have really torn.
=
Those knots are
all very flawed.

---

These berserk shapes
do rotate in atoms.
=
The spheres are to be
as knotted or amiss.

---

Darkness' atoms:
=
As dreams' knots.

---

Those gibbous and crescent
moons are in this.
=
Night is creation;
roundness becomes as both.

---

Our every lunar answer
is as some.
=
Any universe was
more so surreal.

---

In this negation,
=
One anti-thing is.

---

As nil, those nils'
symmetries are round.
=
All randomness is
mysterious therein.

---

Ranting morons:
=
Ignorant norms.

---

White-supremacists do
murder, as does this rot.
=
Their hate's sadisms
corrupted true wisdom so.

---

A sword..
=
was rod.

---

Error-code cast:
=
Or as corrected.

---

Sphericalness is
an absurdity.
=
Labyrinths inside
are as cusps.

---

A semicircle spins there
as into those.
=
Its hemispherical cones
are its tones.

----------------------------------
----------------------------------
Palindrome:

'Ode: We kill like we do.'

----------------------------------
----------------------------------

Suggestion:
Another term for your proper
first-name (ie. your so-called
'Christian-name'):

Your..

'Nicholas-name'.

----------------------------------

Suggested band-name:

'Gag-Disorder'

----------------------------------

An art-desecrating graffiti
"artist" uses the underlying
preexisting artwork to..
draw-upon.. for inspiration.

----------------------------------

You hear about* the anchorman
who became an artist to create
bronze sculptures of the human
form?

Yeah, he went from being a
newscaster...
to being a.. nudes-caster!..


*(Literally, did you hear or
read about this before?
This joke seems vaguely
familiar; maybe I posted it
[paraphrased] to this blog
already, maybe long ago.)
----------------------------------
[Speaking of topics I may
have already posted long ago..]

If one can brush one's teeth,
then why cannot one comb one's
teeth also?

That must be what they use the
proverbial "fine-tooth combs"
for, then?
To comb one's fine teeth?..

[Seriously, maybe 'tooth combing'
is essentially flossing, perhaps.]

----------------------------------

So are "general-interest magazines"
then all about military hardware
and military patriotic rah-rah and
strategy and stuff that would
interest generals?...

Yes, yes they are.


[Very high likelihood I already
read or heard some variation of
this joke somewhere before.
Yes, as in-fact I surely know,
I quite indeed did.]
----------------------------------
----------------------------------
[Warning: Next 4 items are
political in nature.
Warning:
Many may find offensive.]


Suggested sound-bite for a Texan
congressional candidate who
promises to be a budget-balancer
in Washington:

"Them fellers in DC sure like
to keep kickin' the can.
Well, I'm here, I tell ya',
to kick the bull-crap."

----------------------------------

I was wondering about
this the other day:..

Milk products sold in the US from
cows not given certain hormones
are required to have that one
government-approved message
{ie. warning} on their labels
which reads something like,
paraphrasing, "The milk from cows
raised without [letters] growth-
hormone is not significantly
different from milk coming from
non-hormone-free cows."

But meanwhile,..

Any old cheeses or whatever milk
products at all can have the word
"Natural" prominently displayed on
that milk-product's packaging,
even though the word "Natural"
means not one damn thing at all,
period.

Some major lobbying from the
less-than-hormone-free milk-product
industry has been afoot (or ahoof),
perhaps!?..

------

Speaking of lobbyists...

I now realize that lobbyists
themselves also need a lobby
organization -- as lobbyists are
now days getting a bad rap in
regards to public-opinion and
due to the possibility that
lobbyists' power over our
government may be curtailed
soon somewhat {HA! HA!} due to
that negative public-opinion
(but not really).

Or, seriously, do
lobbyist-lobby-organizations
already exist
(and are officially regarded
by these organizations
themselves as being established
exactly for that one purpose)?

The American League of Lobbyists,
or.. "ALL".

(The absolutely least necessary
lobbying organization in history.
Doesn't, uh,.. money.. lobby for
all lobbyists,.. and do so quite
well, even?)

----------------------------------
----------------------------------

Seriously:

I likely have posted already
a long while ago about the
suggested new term for
"homophobe': "Hate-rosexual".

I may have stated then too
that the word "homophobe"
just does not sound quite
evil enough, and it does not
seem to convey the bigotry
that may be inflicted by
homophobes (which may include
anything from simply being
quietly/passively/harmlessly
somewhat personally disturbed
by homosexuality, to carrying
out personal acts of
discrimination, to outright
political policy-making and
official discrimination, to
physically violent attacks
against gays, to genocidal
mass-executions of
homosexuals as part of
some governments' official
domestic and/or foreign
policy).

So, I would go further, in
many cases at least, than
simply calling homophobes
the almost humorous-sounding
"hate-rosexuals", let alone
continuing to simply refer
to them as "homophobes"
(which often is really
giving them too much benefit
of the doubt about the harm
thay can each do). Maybe our
society should perhaps call
them instead something like
"Heterosexual-Supremacists",
perhaps?
This would create a deserved
mental-association with
another type of bigots, the
racist White-Supremacists.
And maybe the threat posed
by the anti-gay bigots
to society in-general,
not just to the gays,
would therefore be taken
more seriously then?

Unfortunately, from a
marketing stand-point,
"Heterosexual-Supremacists"
is much too long and
unwieldy a term, with far
too many syllables.

But "Straight-Supremacists"
sounds almost goofy.

"Hetero-Supremacists"
might be what would work
best from a getting-popular
stand-point, especially
given its syllable-count;
but from the literal
stand-point, it is not
a good enough term, because
"Hetero" regarding what
exactly?
(Although, "hetero" is
indeed a slang term for
heterosexual, so this is
probably the best term
we can hope for now days.)

----------------------------------
----------------------------------

Regarding the Earth's mantle and
a fireplace's mantle (mantel):

Both types of mantle
are so very hot.
But one type is
even more so,
while the other..
mostly is not.

----------------------------------

Yet unknown to us, the
ultimate enlightenment
will be our...

'Surrealization'.

----------------------------------
----------------------------------

Update: Regarding my question in
the last post where I ask,
in-part...
[Is colorblindness (the type
where the colors are seen
but are transposed) a form
of synesthesia, in a way,
but taking place within
only one sense?]:

I realize now that if every
color is "transposed" with
one other, as compared with
the average way colors are
perceived by most people,
then the person with this
types of color-blindness,
if it even is a type of
color-blindness, may not
even know anything was
amiss -- and maybe
nothing would be amiss,
in fact.
How do we each know that
the colors we think we
see are seen in the same
ways that others see them?
[And this question is not
only in regards to colors.]

For all I know, no one
else on Earth even
perceives colors at all,
or even has any conscious
awareness of any perception
or thoughts they think
or any feelings they feel**.

----------------------------------
**[Regarding^:
They may only FEEL that
they personally have any
feelings, or may only THINK
they have any thoughts, for
all THEY know (that they know).

It is like that philosophical
question, maybe, I posted
here a few months ago.
What if someone dreams they
have received a secret prize
in an unopened box.
Before they dream that they
have opened the box -- and
especially if they wake before
opening it -- what is the
significance, if any, of
what is "really" in the box?

As for Schrodinger's Cat,
in-actuality, the cat itself
does not even exist;...
but neither does the box,
.. nor does the Geiger-counter
or radioactive substance,..
nor does the poison,.. nor
does even Erwin Schrodinger
himself,... nor even, in any
likelihood,.. do you.***]


***(Maybe this alone explains
the low numbers of readers
my blog has.)
----------------------------------

Leroy

Absencelessness-lessnesslessness..

Blog-post # 427:
(427 = 7*61.)


Eight new inanimations,
again crappily "scanned":
(My images cannot
be well scanned;
ie. they scannot be.)

Paradox Bifurcated
Into Its Trifurcation,
Unto Quadfurcation,
Or Furthermore

As Space-Time's Blurs
Formed From Emptiness

Unfactorable Refractions Of Truth
Into Truth's Hues Each Unknown

Among The Many
Integer Divisors
Of Any Non-Integer

Non-Annular Sphericalness
Of Ring-like Cones

The Top-Heavy Finitude Of All

Transiting Through The Transposition
Of Transparentness, And Conversely

Light Versus Its Own
Self-Dissimilarities

----------------------------
----------------------------
Anagrams --
Of ten again,
but not
often a gain.]


A paradox-lessness
as mathematical:
=
Space's axioms are
all made sans that.

---

This obliteration
thus was this.
=
It abolishes its
own truth it has.

---

Angst sees nihilism.
=
This is meaningless.

---

Strange was id;
=
As weird angst.

---

All this hate:
=
That is a Hell.


[^Did I do this
anagram already?
Humanity surely
has, however,
historically
again, again,
and yet again.]
---

Superposition's
causality:
=
It is as you,
plus as entropic.

---

The eclipses:
=
These splice.

---

As circular:
=
Arc is a curl.

---

The circular mystery
as meaningless:
=
Any aligns. Symmetric
curls are these.

---

Rotation is turning as
does that weird symmetry.
=
The mysterious and yet
random ring was to stir it.

----------------------------
----------------------------

The clowns in the circus
were bound to have irked us;
with their psychedelic frowns
and their siren-y sounds
(Honk! Honk!); such clowns
and their frowns and sounds
are all surreally profound
but are surely BeRsErKus.

----------------------------
----------------------------

That student's report-card
marks have worsened to now
be below average.

Yes, the quality of that
student's schoolwork
has become..

D-graded..

----------------------------

Thinking it is secure
to be encoding a message
by simply spelling it
backwards would be quite
some..

'E.D.O.C.'

on your part..

----------------------------
[And elsewhere regarding
hallucinational-security..]


An enlightened liberal says:

"I'm not prejudiced
against the Muslims.
Hey, some of my best
'enemies-of-my-enemies'
are Muslims, even!"..

----------------------------

Beware the toxin,
for it could..

'chemi-kill'..

you.

----------------------------

Being nearsighted:

Having.. 'blurndness'..


[It's okay. I'm one of them.]
----------------------------
----------------------------

Questions:

Is colorblindness (the type
where the colors are seen
but are transposed) a form
of synesthesia, in a way,
but taking place within
only one sense?

Is there such a condition
as color-nearsightedness,
where colors are seen
correctly up close, but
farther away they are not?
(I myself may have this
condition a bit; I suppose
that the cones of the eye
need at least a little
sharply focused light
from the gazed-upon object
to correctly assess the
color of that object.)

And is there a condition
where the eye perceives the
hues correctly, but the
luminance values of what is
looked upon are all wrong,
either being transposed or
being all constant or being
wrong in some other way
(much more wrongly seen
than those luminance values
would be seen normally by
most people)?

----------------------------
----------------------------

Perhaps (BS!..), if there
are no examples of infinite
magnitudes of anything in
the universe, then we thus
have zero infinities. And
thus we have a universe of
"zero-times-infinity"s,
each of which is numerically
indeterminate and can equal
any mathematical quantity
at all.

So, every measurement of
every aspect of anything
in this universe is
indeterminate and thus is
uncertain. And therefore,
if every measurement is
finite, quantum-physics
is then true
(or is not true)..

QED... (????)..

----------------------------

Relatively more seriously:

In my last post I mentioned
the infinitely large word
(which was spelled with a
finite number of letters)
"meaninglessness-lessness..
..lessnesslessness..
..lessnesslessness..",
with "..lessness.."
repeated ad-infinitum
(if only conceptually
repeated as so).

I suppose that this word
is an interesting concept,
if meaninglessly (or not)
it so is,.. maybe.

Let me see if I can
analyze this concept
more rigorously:..

Hmmm..

First-order:
"Meaninglessness" --
The concept of being
without meaning,
without definition,
and/or without purpose.

Second-order:
"Meaninglessnesslessness"
-- The concept of being
without meaninglessness;
ie. the concept that
whatever (regarding what
this refers to) has
at least some meaning,
definition, and/or
purpose (but is not
necessarily completely
meaningful).

Third-order:
"Meaninglessness..
..lessnesslessness" --
The concept of being
sans meaninglessness-
..lessness; ie. the
concept that whatever
(what thing is being
referred to) has
at least some
meaningless aspects,
or maybe does, but
certainly is not
meaningful in every
way (or maybe it is?),
and it may even be
completely without
meaning.

Fourth-order:
"Meaninglessness..
..lessnesslessness..
..lessness" --
The concept of being
without
meaninglessness..
..lessnesslessness;
ie. the concept that
whatever (what is
being referred to) is
devoid of having any
possible meaningless
aspects, or maybe
is devoid of having
any uncertainty
regarding which
aspects it has are
meaningless and which
are meaningful, or
maybe, or..?..

Etcetera...

(So, meaninglessness
wins, then?..)


I was also considering the
idea of the similar type
of word,
"paradoxlessness-lessness..
..lessnesslessness..
..lessnesslessness..".
This seems to be maybe
quite a paradox itself, as
it simultaneously is not.
Maybe it is much like the
famous Liar's Paradox, but
applies to the concept
of 'paradox' itself,
rather than to the usually
simpler and relatively
more straightforward
concept of truth-vs-lies.

In any case, if one wants
to be REALLY profound,
maybe they could come up
with such an infinite word
or maybe a self-referential
sentence which not only
flips back and forth at
each iteration between two
opposing truth-values (in
regards to some aspect of
that word's/sentence's
own meaning), but also
at each stage becomes
more and more convoluted
(perhaps with a bifurcation
of truth-value possibilities
at each stage) as it applies
to the concept of the
concept (of the concept of
the concept of..) of that
very logical paradox itself.

[But I myself have other
stuff to do today..]
----------------------------
----------------------------

Meta-dichotomy:

{Pepper-movers
versus
Salt-shakers}

VERSUS

{Pepper-shakers
versus
Salt-movers}

----------------------------

Therefore, forever is
evermore moreover as
overlapped and as
lopsidedly sideways.

----------------------------

Leroy

Oxiomatic Axymora, Or Conversely

["Oxiomatic axymora" are
all quite as axymoronical
as is any axiom, and are
all quite as oxymoronical
as is any oxiom; or thus
they are all (as is
axiomatically obvious)
quite the converse yet
otherwise.. vice-versa.]

Blog-post # 426:
(426 = 2*71*3.)

(And the factorization of
the last post's number, 425,
is 5*17*5. And since 71 is
17 written backwards, and
5 = 2 + 3, then...
Whatever...)
(.. However, today's date
cane be written as
4-14-14, which can be
written as:
4,1,4,1,4.
And the sum of these
numbers is 14.
So,.. whatever, again!..)

Five new art inanimations:

The Three Multiples Of 3,
Of Multiplicity,
And Of Morphology

Spherein
Indeterminominators'
Ratioless Radii

Meaninglessness-lessness..
..lessnesslessness...

Herein The Spherically
Conical Cosmos

Asymmetric Hourglassiness
(Counterbalanced If Clockwise)

I think I already wrote about
the neologism in the second
image's name, "Spherein",
which is 'herein the sphere',
of course. The second of the
neologisms in that title,
"Indeterminominators", is a
portmanteau I talk about
below in this post.

The third image's name
is infinitely long (but is
represented here with many
fewer letters).
Its ending continues with
..'lessness'.. repeated
ad-infinitum, of course.
What does it mean!?..
(Or not mean?..)

--------------------------------
--------------------------------
Anagrams:
(Six is.)


Topology is as the entirety.
=
Those loops are yet tying it.

---

Situational-topology
is else that process.
=
Its logistics are solely
atop/at/upon those.

---

The oxymoron is
affirmed more
so as this.
=
Irony does form from
these axioms it has.

---

Space's dense shape
mostly is forgotten.
=
The strangeness of
a cosmos yet slipped.

---

Asymmetry is/was
of this/that/any
altered hourglass.
=
And yet its
light-rays form
sums as what
they also are.

---

Sand is spun into
shards of light;
Yet fire made those;...
=
As the finite ends formed
this Dystopian hourglass.

--------------------------------

[Aside, regarding
2nd anagram above:

"Situational-topology"
seems like a good new
term for logistics,
or for a strategy,
process, method, or
algorithm to handle
any complex task or
to prearrange the
components of any
complex series
of events.

Or maybe it should
only describe the
"shape" of that
complex series of
events, rather
than the methods
to deal with that
(space-time) shape.

But, either way,
I would expect the
term to soon become
a much over-used
buzz-phrase, often
appearing, say, in
board-meetings and
business reports,
.. if my blog ever
was read by anyone,
that is.]

--------------------------------
--------------------------------
Palindrome:

'I may be by. Am I?'

--------------------------------
--------------------------------

Are "Scape Goats"..

Scape-ricorns?..

--------------------------------

Why did the heart-attack victim
hate so much those paramedics
who saved his life?

Because they..
're-pulsed' him!


(And also, because of
their 'de-fib-rillator',
he then was forced to
stop his.. lying
{on the ground}.)
--------------------------------

Maybe a more so
politically-correct
term for the undead:

'Posthumous-Beings'.

(i.e. Post-human-beings?)

--------------------------------

What sounds do ..
'spirits'.. make?..

"BOOOOze!..."..

(And this pun also leads
to "Booo!"s, too's.)

[I must have heard this joke
somewhere before... Maybe upon
the stroke of midnight* and
amongst the sound of rattling
heavy chains?..]

*(No, probably not from a
late-night TV comedy bit.)
--------------------------------

From my last post,
speaking of late-night TV:

[That TV offer is substantial;
.. as substance also is..
a.. void where prohibited.]

PS:
"But wait!.. There's less!"..

--------------------------------

(This week in math-class:
Inequalities.)

You students better
study your 'less-ons',..

or you will become..
'more-ons'!..

--------------------------------

Irrational real numbers
(ie. those numbers with
the infinitely long
non-repeating decimal
expansions) are like
fractions; but, other
than possessing integer
denominators, they are
instead divided by what?
...

'Indeterminominators'!

--------------------------------

That monotonically increasing
quantity became just a..
little-too-big..
as it went just from being..
little-to-big!..

--------------------------------
--------------------------------

Norman was a poor man.
So he then became a doorman.
But in that was his torment,
as in that he was dormant.
And Norman was so dormant
being that doorman
of his torment that thus
he was like a doormat
or even like a floor-mat.
And so he was more than
even he ever so more so
was likewise as that.

Therefore,
the plan he formed
to become a foreman.
Ah, as in his plan
and in his need,
he had so achieved,
and, indeed, he then
became that foreman
for all the doormen.
And as that foreman
of all the doormen,
he was more dominant
than was any doormat
or than any floor-mat
or than any doorman
or dormant poor man
of his former torment.

For, more firmly so
was he no more that
-- as he now was
neither a poor man
nor a former doorman.

And he was no more
of that or than that
which he had formed,
than..
what he was before,
before in this score
evermore in his core:

Forever at his door.

-------

More:

Eli,
The More-So Moral Moray-Eel,
was more so moral than was
Morty,
The More-So Moral Moray-Eel.

Or, this Eli more so knew.
And, as you also do
in regards to you, he too
claimed his morality true.

But Morty was moreover
evermore more so moral
than was any other eel
or than was any coral,
as he more so knew
than even do you.

Yet, Eli did proclaim
the very same.
Or more so he agreed
his morality did exceed
his own greedy need
for being more so
moral and more moral
than Morty, than Morty
the so-called More-So
Moral Moray-Eel;..

And conversely,
Morty more so said
that Eli was bad,
and that he, Morty,
was good,
and that these deeds
(of his moral greed)
had done more good
than any more-so
moral moray eel's
deeds even should.

And so went
Eli's and Morty's
oral/aural quarrel
regarding who is
the most so moral.

And then they each
did finally reach
that final breach;
and their morality
became a fatality;
and that mortality
became more than
their hypocrisy.
Or more so did so
Eli else so
and Morty also
so morally lapse;..
as eels do elapse,
perhaps,
if they are ever so
more so moral than
even all morality.

As they are each
more so as they
so are:
Quite more so less
or less than moral.

(Thus, the moral
of this story is
more so of this:
Hence, herein,
it is the story
of this which is
a moral moral.)

--------------------------------
--------------------------------

Leroy